Tuesday, January 14, 2025
HomeEnglishWas the Use of “Who” Instead of “Whom” Against the New York...

Was the Use of “Who” Instead of “Whom” Against the New York Times’ House Rules?

The question of whether the New York Times’ style guidelines allow for using “who” instead of “whom” comes down to the publication’s approach to grammar and readability. Traditionally, “whom” is used as the object of a verb or preposition, while “who” serves as the subject. However, modern usage has largely relaxed these rules, with “whom” often perceived as overly formal or outdated.

See also  How do you say "is" in Chinese?

The New York Times, like many reputable publications, prioritizes clarity and accessibility in its writing. While “whom” may be technically correct in certain situations, the Times often opts for “who” in cases where it feels more natural or conversational. This doesn’t necessarily go against house rules—it aligns with a broader shift in modern journalism to favor readability over rigid adherence to traditional grammar.

See also  Active and Passive Voice Exercises

In essence, the use of “who” instead of “whom” is not a rebellion against the rules but a reflection of evolving language norms and the desire to connect with readers in a clear, relatable way.

RELATED ARTICLES
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Leave a Reply

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x