A YouTube video can be considered either a primary or a secondary source, depending on its content. If the video features original material, such as an interview, documentary, or a personal vlog, it qualifies as a primary source, offering firsthand accounts or direct evidence of a topic. However, if the video is a commentary, analysis, or compilation of existing sources, it becomes a secondary source. In essence, the classification hinges on whether the video presents original content or interprets and reflects on information from other sources. Context and intent are key in determining its categorization.
Is a YouTube video considered a primary source or a secondary source?
RELATED ARTICLES
0 Comments
Oldest